Showing posts with label Lutheranism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lutheranism. Show all posts

Thursday, February 05, 2026

The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod and Matt Harrison have big-ass shit on their hands

 Rev. Michael William Mohr, president of the Central Illinois District of the denomination, was arrested last month on a child porn charge. Details of the allegations behind the original charge indicate a wanton, ongoing problem.

More here, on the DOJ's news release. I quote this part in backup of the original: 

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Department of Justice Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims.

LCMS President Matthew Harrison whipped out the old "rule of law," in the "innocent until proven guilty" division, in his response

Gee, let's just sound like the Vatican and its various dioceses and archdioceses.  Or people who allegedly originally investigated Jeffrey Epstein.

I note this at the end:

Updated on Jan. 30, 2026, at the request of authorities.

Oh, that looks good. You're so anti-proactive the cops have to tell you? 

Saturday, September 20, 2025

LCMS prez Matthew Harrison headfakes, then dives back into full wingnuttery.

Harrison, the president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, the US's largest fundamentalist (you are) religious body, is trying to thread his theological and denominational camel's body through the eye of the Charlie Kirk needle with his official statement on Kirk's killing.

I had originally titled this post that he had backed off slightly from being a full wingnut, but a follow-up piece in an official publication of the denomination shows that's not true. I'll get to that below. 

It says it's about 15 years in the president's seat. Most of it backs off his previous nuttery and actually talks about assisting immigrants.

That said, besides the Charlie Kirk paeans that ignore his racism, etc., let's unpack something else.

That's Harrison officially stating that on one thing, he's unchanged, and that he's a Samuel Huntington type cultural Christianist. This:

I think it’s vital to retain Western Christian influenced culture and its wonderful blessings. But we Lutherans do not exist to “Christianize the state.” Our Augsburg Confession says the state and church are not to be “mixed.” I worry, frankly, about Muslim immigration and the orthodox Muslim denial of the two kingdoms. But some evangelicals have the same dogma! A great many of the decisions of the nature of state and law, are left to sanctified individual choice and action, biblically informed.

Is the proof. 

First, you DO want to "Christianize the state," just more indirectly.

Second, not all Muslims are "orthodox" Muslims.  

Third? Most of what does make Merikkka in particular, and the West in general, actually, non-snarkily good, has nothing to do with Christian, or Christian-influenced culture. Locke, Hume, Montaigne, Voltaire and others who influenced the American constitutional structure, the American political science structure and related, weren't "Christian-influenced." Locke was probably a U/unitarian or Deist. Hume was a secularist, non-theist, atheist, etc. Montaigne may have been a Catholic, but his essays on the tripartate division of government were in no way influenced by that. Voltaire was a deist. 

On other non-Charlie Kirk stuff, he references the wingnuts squared to his right, who think that officially breathing the air of other Christians in official Christian events is akin to heresy:

As I pulled into the gas station this a.m., I turned on the radio. There were interviews with children whose fathers were firemen, killed in 9/11. Oh my, I thought. Another anniversary of that horrid day. I remember it all too well. Within a week I was at ground zero. The LCMS provided a million dollars for the victims’ center in Manhattan. The controversy in the LCMS which ensued nearly broke my heart. Thank God we’ve moved beyond it and our approach to such situations constructed in the wake, has very largely kept us out of further internal controversy.

Have fun with that. 

Beyond that, he, in talking about Kirk's death:

Yesterday was the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk. A confessing Christian murdered for political speech. I beheld the news in shock, bouncing between the reports of sorrow and vitriol, putting the worst possible construction on sound bites. ... A few on our far edges say untoward things about race, failing to take into account the beautiful message of the N.T. that “God is no respecter of persons.” (Acts 10) And that repeatedly in the N.T. we see lists of early Christians which include multiple ethnicities from around the Mediterranean world. There is no N.T. argument against the freedom to marry among ethnicities, much less any such distinctions in the church. Jesus said, “Go therefore to all ETHNAE.”

Ignores Kirk's own racism.

Maybe he doesn't know that much about Kirk in general. Maybe fear of the even further right wingnuts pushed him to say something. Maybe he's just a lying hypocrite.  

Hence my "backs off slightly."

He's still a hypocrite, perhaps a lying hypocrite, and hoisting himself by his own petard. 

Sadly, this is in my own family of semi-origin. A cousin, a former LCMS parochial school teacher, ran Kirk up the flagpole and saluted him. I'm not going to bother to quote her, but without naming her by name, I called out on Fuckbook, in a general way, Lutheran family and friends for glorifying Kirk, a "racist wingnut." I also told them to read Matthew 7:3-5 if they thought this secularist needed praying for. Per Jesus himself, elsewhere? "A word to the wise." 

==

The wise don't include Harrison, who, since I first started writing this, in the Reporter, the official LCMS newspaper, runs Kirk up the flagpole and salutes him. Time for a takedown.

This:

Pundits have crafted lists of Mr. Kirk’s statements, which allegedly justify his murder. But no speech of any human being justifies his or her murder.

Is a lie. Actual pundits have listed Kirk's wingnuttery, but without attempting to justify his murder. I said that if he had named named, it could have been slanderous. Even without that, I told him to look at Matthew 7:3-5 and tell himself the Sixth Commandment rather than shouting it at others.

This:

Marxism, which is pervasive on many university campuses, praises anarchy and violence because violence is the means to throw the status quo into chaos and overthrow allegedly repressive regimes. As an atheistic paradigm of human social existence, Marxism views all law and ethics as utilitarian, indeed merely a human construct — including sexual identity itself, which has always been (Rom. 1) and is again, with an intensity never seen before, the frontier of “freedom” from Divine design. Hermann Sasse, the friend of the LCMS and great Lutheran who lived through the Hitler years in Germany, was the first publicly to reject the Aryan Paragraph of the Nazi party platform. He blew the whistle on real fascism and racism.

Is a mix of stereotyping, strawmanning, handwaving and dogwhistling. The "real fascism and racism" is an attempt to pretend that Kirk wasn't that.

This:

Charlie Kirk was such a Christian. I am such a Christian. And I know thousands more. ... “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven.” (Matt. 5:43–45) Charlie’s debate videos are a marvelous example of this.

Is whitewashing. And gaslighting. And other things.

Harrison likes to blather about the Sixth Commandment, all while ignoring the Eighth Commandment, in all of this, too. 

==

Harrison also ignores Romans 8 about submitting unto the governing authorities!

Harrison claims not to meddle in church-state issues and to respect the Lutheran doctrine of the "two kingdoms."

BUT? He officially glorifies in Charlie Kirk an official 2020 election denier. And, AFAIK, while he may have disciplined (or may not have disciplined) a semi-retired Illinois LCMS pastor for participating in an interdenominational event, he has done NOTHING (AFAIK) about said pastor trying to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results.

Romans 13, along with the Eighth Commandment, Matthew Harrison.

Saturday, April 26, 2025

Top blogging, first quarter of 2025

 A couple of weeks late, but better late than never, eh?

As is normal, and as with the monthly roundup on my main blog, these were the most read in the first three months of this year, without necessarily being written then. "Evergreen" items from the past will be so noted.

10th? My 2022 post on the great ahistoricity of Acts — and radical thoughts on Paul's demise — is trending in part because I posted it as a comment at Paul Davidson's "Is That in the Bible" site, and also because it's linked in No. 7 below.

In 9th? A recent post about putting Hindu-Buddhist theological carts before consciousness horses.

At 8 is an oldie from 2021 about the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod shutting down its Concordia University in Portland because it was too doctrinally loose on some issues, and the shitload of fallout that caused — fallout that, AFAIK, has not been totally resolved. Teh Google shows no recent news, but does show LCMS insidiousness at work earlier this year on its university in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

At No. 7, from earlier this year, is my "semi-disappointing foul ball" critique of "God's Ghostwriters" by Candida Moss.

At No. 6, from just a month ago? A hard-hitting callout of LCMS president Matthew Harrison for godawful theology in sucking up to Trumpistan. Some of it is bad theology by Lutheran vs Reformed Protestantism lights, others is just bad theology period. I suspect it's only going to get worse over the next three years and nine months.

No. 5? From a year ago, my critique of new and weird claims about Morton Smith and Secret Mark. It may be trending because I posted it on Skeptophilia blogger Gordon Bonnet's page when he wrote a post about a month ago talking about "Mysterious Mark" or something and I thought fragments of a previously unknown gospel had been found until I started reading.

No. 4? From last month, the latest installation of the gift that keeps on giving, the latest wrongness at the r/AcademicBiblical subreddit.

No. 3? A claim that a so-called (and yes, that part is needed) Plague of Cyprian nearly collapsed the Roman Empire, the subject of an entire recent book, "The Fate of Rome," is pretty much wrong in many ways, and may be close to the old physics Not.Even.Wrong. world.

No. 2? My second takedown of "Matty" Harrison, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod president, came after the Portland issue, in 2023. This was over his handling of the "Lutefash" issue within his denomination, including pastors, including, in an update, one involved with the "Steal the Vote" effort in Georgia 2020. As with No. 6, I expect this will only get worse over the next three years and nine months because Matthew Harrison is a big "trimmer" as well as a big politician. (If you think organized religion — and not just tribes within Christianity on that — isn't politicized, you need to think again.)

No. 1? I love not only kicking touters of Buddhism, like Robert Wright and his ilk that claims it's not a religion, but kicking ideas in Buddhism behind that.  "More proof that the Buddha was no Buddha" goes back to 2007.

And, with 2, 6, and 8, I decided Harrison needed his own tag.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Holy Week: A secularist perception 30 years out


Salvador Dali's ethereal version of The Last Supper, not the Lord's Supper. The title is theologically correct per Matthew.

It's actually been a bit over 30 years since I graduated from Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, Missouri with my master's of divinity degree, realizing before graduation that, at minimum, I wasn't a fundamentalist Lutheran.

But, I "searched" for a couple of years, looking mentally at more liberal Lutheranism, and bits of other more liberal Protestantism, too. I looked at Unitarianism. Went to a few services. Looking for a possible full-time career, as I realized I couldn't do liberal Lutheranism, either, I inquired about the Unitarian ministry. I was told I'd have to do another full-year internship, and then, there was still no guarantee of a hiring, of course.

Went to a few meetings of the St. Louis chapter of The Ethical Society; already then, it may have been the largest outpost of the organization.

I also ran through Buddhist ideas, what I knew then, in my head. (And, yes, once again, contra Robert Wright, it's a religion. Still is.)

I didn't think much about Hinduism, despite Eckankar having an office or whatever across one side street from the seminary's grounds. (Said grounds, with lots of semi-forested area, also attracted several people I am guessing were Shinto. And, real Shinto, not Meiji state Shinto.) Never thought about Islam.

Anyway, I passed on all of them, and by 30 years ago, was a confirmed secularist. Here's the last of a six-part series on my journey.

A few years later, encountering the self-help world, I tried to do that. Even read some of the "manifestation" type books, and — I couldn't.

About 20 years ago or a bit more, I got lost while hiking in Canyonlands National Park, in late July. I ran out of water. I cycled through prayers to Yahweh, Jesus, Allah, Olympian and Norse divinities, Vishnu and more — and then stopped.

Anyway, here I am today.

Whipping through friends' of friends' Facebook pages yesterday, I saw .... gack.

Along with pious Lutheranism, cheapish memes. AI-generated versions of Maundy Thursday and Palm Sunday art. (This sets aside Hyam Maccoby's claim that this event probably happened on Sukkoth, not Passover [if it happened at all].)

Not on Lutheran friends' of friends' pages, but elsewhere, I've seen the "If Jesus had a gun, he'd still be alive." Some wingnuts may be trying to "own the liberals" with that, but others may not have a clue that most varieties of Christianity preach a substitutionary atonement. So, no, Jesus with a gun defeats the whole purpose, according to Christianity. (And yes, the idea that many self-professed [self-alleged?] Christians might be that theologically illiterate is no shock to me and shouldn't be to you.)

Anyway, even without the more cringey stuff on friends' of friends' pages, college or seminary alums of mine, I realized just how foreign that all is to me. 

It's not as distant as it may be for an Orthodox Jew, let alone a Buddhist, but ... it's foreign.

That said, Gnu Atheism — especially Jesus mysticism subvariants that seem to believe Jesus MUST BE and MUST BE PROVEN TO BE nonexistent for atheism to be firm, are just about as foreign. And possibly even more stupid. It's definitely more illogical.

And, with that said, as a good secular humanist, as long as fundagelically religious — and Gnu Atheist — neither pick my pocket, nor break my bones, per Thomas Jefferson, I have less and less interest on a regular basis at going attack dog on either one.

Thursday, March 06, 2025

LCMS President Matthew Harrison's latest hypocrisy — a deeper theological dive

About a month ago, I said at my main blog that President-for-Life of the LCMS Matthew Harrison was full of crap — hypocritical crap — in his response to Trump surrogate and general nutter Michael Flynn.

Flynn, per that link, attacked Lutheran Immigration Refugee Services for getting large federal grants for ... uh, helping immigrants. That's even though the LCMS, unlike Rome, can't see its way to doing social justice while remaining theologically conservative.

Flynn, one of Elmo Musk's DOGE-y minions, is of course peddling twaddle. 

So is Matty in his response.

Here, I'm going to expand on some theological issues that I didn't look at there.

Here's the start of that hypocrisy. Matty says:

We don’t say much to or about the government.

Then goes on to talk extensively about the government indeed.

We have suffered formal legal action and much more as we have watched as DEI philosophy (formally rejected by our church body along with white supremacy) has pervaded nearly every aspect of government activity, even as the U.S. government has burgeoned beyond all ethical and rational propriety, in effect stealing the future from our children.

Talking about the size of government in general is talking about government in general. The "taxation is theft" that appears to be in the background of that last line is bigger bullshit, as it's Trump who has run up large parts of the federal budget deficit, Reagan who started it, and Dick Cheney in between who said "deficits don't matter."

Matty doubles down later, while claiming it's "just me, not the LCMS":

Let me just note (and this is NOT an official position of the LCMS): I’m personally pleased with DOGE. The federal government is bloated beyond all rational limits. It can’t fund its activities without accumulating debt. And it’s failing in its basic tasks.

Please.

First, Federal spending ticked up during COVID, yes, but since then, has returned to close to its historic 60-year norm. See the St. Louis Fed. St. Louis, where you are, Matty. Let's add that, in 1998-2001, we actually ran budget surpluses. Gee (with carryover to fiscal 2001) what party controlled the presidency then, Matt? Arguably, you're violating the Eighth Commandment (Lutheran-Catholic-Anglican-Orthodox numbering) by bearing false witness against a political party.

In fact, Trump himself, on Super Bowl Sunday, just blathered to Bret Baier about $36 trillion in national debt without admitting his first term, he was responsible for one-quarter of that.

And again, this is talking about government.

And, because the devil supposedly loves a bible-quoting secularist, now would be the time for Romans 13, I believe:

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists authority resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment

There you are, Matt.

And, if that's not enough? Verse 7 says:

Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue.

(Harrison hasn't called for tax-refusal disobedience. But, somebody might take his ball and run.)

As Jesus said at the end of the tale of the Good Samaritan? Maybe you should "go and do likewise"? 

DEI? Most of it is a capitalist pile of junk. And, no, Matt, even if there is a god, he, she or it didn't invent capitalism. When done rightly, as Costco knows, it's good for business and its good ethics as well.

You didn't mention critical race theory, but I'll but you at least have personal, if not official, thoughts about it. Well, they would be wrong; of that I have no doubt. 

I can say that with confidence for two reasons. The first is that most White wingnuts blather about critical race theory without knowing what it is. The second is that I've read "Silent Covenants" by Derrick Bell, one of the developers of critical race theory, and found it informative and more good than bad.

Let's next do a gotcha call-out, Matt. You say at the end:

At the same time, a well-regulated border, sound immigration policy, and welcoming space for persecuted refugees are all fundamental parts of a God-pleasing answer to the question:

OK, what's your answer to the genocide in Gaza? I already know. Your denomination hasn't called it a genocide, AFAIK, and has basically ignored it and the countless refugees Israel has created. (The LCMS is fundamentalist in its own way, but not evangelical millennialists, so it has no reason to expect Israel to bring on Armageddon.)

For that matter, since we're talking primarily about Hispanics, and you ARE talking about the government, what's your personal — and denominational leadership — take on the United States' history of coups and other meddling in Latin America that destabilizes countries and creates refugees?

But, then let's get to the rhetorical question that follows.

Who will contribute to this marvelous and blessed American experiment?

THAT, my "dear sir," is clearly untheological. The "United States of America" is not in Christian scriptures, and to claim the "American experiment" is "blessed" as an implication that it is, and so is a theological lie. (Paul, in Romans, said that the Roman imperium was divinely established. He did NOT claim it was "marvelous" or "blessed.") It's about as much a lie as the drivel from the Gun Nuts for Luther group which out of thin air implies there's a biblical, god-given right to gunz. It also is a violation of at least the spirit of the First Amendment you claim to love.

Beyond that? As a riff on John Winthrop's city on a hill angle? It's Calvinist, for one thing, and a theological error that, per Augustine, is the religious version of a First Amendment error. It's a confusion and a conflation of the "two kingdoms."

Harrison knows that Zwingli died in battle, sword in hand, and Luther condemned him for that.

Parallel to that, to riff on pseudo-Paul in Ephesians? Christianity is supposed to be about neither Blacks nor Whites, and re Matt's statement, neither Russian nor American.

So, taking sides on sociological issues as a church denomination is itself problematic theologically, above and beyond other issues.

As for the German immigrants you say founded the LCMS?

I said on my original piece about the Lutefash that Harrison was enough of a political chameleon to largely stay above the fray. To the degree he thinks its too much heavy lifting, he'll ignore the underground network of pastors and congregations, of which I only scratched the surface in that initial piece.

That may or may not still be true. But, on secular politics, I guess he just can't help himself.

As for the First Amendment, not Commandment? Contra a college friend of mine, it cuts both ways, per Jefferson. Beyond that, to divert back to theology? Good old Lutheran Richard John Neuhaus (slightly more liberal on biblical criticism than the LCMS brethren he left, but just as conservative as many politically) talked about the "public square." Yes, Keith, churches have every right to participate in the public square. And other participants have just as much right to critique and criticize them as any other participant.

I would say "Here I stand, I can do no other" as a bit of additional mocking, but of course (OF COURSE!) Luther never actually said that. It's just another part of 24-karat gilt Luther legend. FAR more of that legend is exposed here.

From that second link, this observation of mine:

The "yes I'm right" stance of Luther himself, not only vis-a-vis things where he clearly was, but other issues, such as versus the Reformed on the Eucharist, versus many Reformed and other Lutherans on the issue of adiophora and more, seems to still run strong in much of the conservative wing of Lutheranism. (Let's not forget that Luther thought he was competent to condemn Copernicus' heliocentric theory of the solar system, and rushed to do so when his book was published.)

Is quite pertinent to the situation at hand.

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Top blogging of 2024

 As usual, these are the most read pieces from last year, whether or not written in 2024. "Evergreen" ones will be noted by approximate date of publication.

At No. 10, a piece on a mishmash of problems at r/AcademicBiblical (which seems to continue to head downhill) and other biblical criticism subreddits.

At No. 9, since 2017, I have continued to say "Goodbye to 'History for Atheists'" and Tim O'Neill's Samuel Huntington-like Catholic Chistianism.

At No. 8, an exemplum of what's wrong with r/AB, "The Unbearable Lightness of Chris(sy) Hanson," who is independent, and arguably a researcher but most certainly not a scholar.

No. 7 goes to the world of aesthetics, which is part of philosophy, and specifically, to the world of classical music. That's my savage critiquing on how what could have been a good book about 20th century American classical music got butchered.

No. 6? Yes, until proven otherwise, Morton Smith is still the forger of Secret Mark.

No. 5? It's from five years ago, but trending because I posted it at the ex-Lutheran subreddit. The idea of "Gun Nuts in the Name of Luther" and its lies by omission on biblical interpretation will probably jump up more in Trump 2.0.

At No. 4, from early 2024? Contra philosophy of religion prof, it's not fundagelicals vs other Christians, and it's not even literal vs liberal religious believers in general. It's secularists vs everybody else on treating climate change as a climate crisis.

No. 3? Riffing on Rolling Stone et al, in 2023, I wrote about "Fascism in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod." I expect a resurgence in Trump 2.0.

No. 2 was also from 2023, and riffed on Paul Davidson of "Is That in the Bible," as well as, via him, my reading of Idan Dershowitz's then-new monograph on what Moses Wilhelm Shapira may actually have found. "Standing Josiah and Deuteronomy on their heads" tied together a number of threads in biblical criticism.

And at No. 1?

A very evergreen, 2007, "More proof the Buddha was no Buddha." (I have a new piece about Stephen Batchelor coming up in a week.) For more on my thoughts in general, click the Buddhism tag.

Thursday, January 02, 2025

Top blogging, fourth quarter of 2024

As is normally the case, these may not all have been written in late 2024, but they were the most-read pieces of mine in that quarter.

At No. 10, a 2009 oldie but goodie, reposted recently on a subreddit. "Paul, Passover, Jesus, Gnosticism"; the title should lead you in.

At No. 9, from early 2024, "It's secularists vs all others on taking climate seriously" is an important issue in addressing the climate crisis as crisis.

At No. 8, from in this past quarter, my thoughts on the idea that changing from pen to typewriter changed Nietzsche's philosophy and philosophizing.

No. 7? A semi-oldie from 2020, how a Lutheran college myth, from my now-closed alma mater, about Paul Hill, wound up biting the dust.

No. 6? My crushing review of a bad book about language origins issues, including crushing its claims of massive modularity in the brain.

No. 5? Another callout of teh stupidz at Reddit's r/AcademicBiblical, stupidity over Luke-Acts, mod hypocrisy over theological beliefs and more, among other things.

No. 4? It's from five years ago, but trending because I posted it at the ex-Lutheran subreddit. The idea of "Gun Nuts in the Name of Luther" and its lies by omission on biblical interpretation will probably jump up more in Trump 2.0.

No. 3 was my spoofing and mocking of — complete with Monty Python angle — Francis the Talking Pope's pending "patron saint of the internet," with the Sacred Heart of would be St. Acutis and all!

No. 2 was my mocking review of seeming Gnu Atheist bad history in the book "Nature's God."

And, at No. 1?

Just a couple of weeks after No. 5, it was about more problems at r/AcademicBiblical, which seems to be going downhill in general.

Saturday, April 13, 2024

Top blogging, first quarter of 2024

These are the most-viewed posts of mine within the past three months. That doesn't mean all of them are from the last three months. I'll indicate where not.

No. 10? More oopses at r/Academic Biblical, with the worst I documented being some nutter about "666."

No. 9? A two-paragraph brief from way back in 2007. "Patriots, gurus, scoundrels, martyrs" was, I think, the second post here to draw vigorous protests from "Addle Allone." I have one suspicion who that person is, but am not sold on it.

No. 8? Yes, Morton Smith is indeed the forger of Secret Mark. And, a 2023 book won't convince me otherwise.

No. 7? Some counterfactual/alt history about Caesar and the Ides of March.

No. 6? Trending from 2020 because I posted it at Reddit's r/classicalmusic, my saying at that time that I would take a pass on Fabio Luisi helming the Dallas Symphony Orchestra.

No. 5? From last year, about fascism in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. (Since posting it, I have crossed swords on Twitter with the chief fascist nutter of the story, Corey Mahler. Unfortunately, I didn't screengrab and now I'm blocked. IIRC, it was him spouting false flag nuttery about the Crocus attack in Moscow.)

No. 4? I murdered Robert Sapolsky, figuratively speaking, over "Determined."

No. 3? From last fall, and getting new reading from posting at a biblical criticism group, obviously NOT the blocked-to-me r/academicbiblical, my piece on Josiah not being Josiah, proto-Deuteronomy and more.

No. 2? The second from 2007, "more proof the Buddha was no Buddha," and possibly the first piece of mine to draw that vigorous reaction from Addle Allone. Allone, maybe, but not alone in reacting to this. Oh, while we're there? Buddhism is still a religion.

No. 1? Andy Clark is all wet as a philosopher of consciousness.

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Top posts, last quarter of 2023

 I don't do a monthly roundup, unlike at my main blog. But, here is a roundup of the last quarter of 2023.

 Again, not all of these may have been written in 2023, but they were the most read the last quarter.

We'll start from the bottom.

No. 10? Bart Ehrman goes from JW to Marcionite, comparing his second most recent book to his most recent. 

No. 9? An extended book review. "A Canticle for Leibowitz" was VERY interesting, but a set of secong and third thoughts led me to call out various things related to the ethnicity of that person Leibowitz.

No. 8 was one of many posts about stupidities at Reddit's r/AcademicBiblical, as I called out a shitload of stupidity in people commenting on a post about the Woman Taken in Adultery pericope from John.

No. 7? "Say goodbye to History for Atheists" was written in 2017, but has been updated more than once since then.

No. 6 was also from last year, and also from r/AcademicBiblical. and was various commenting fails by "Smart Fool" at the same subreddit.  

No. 5? The myth that Paul Hill from St. John's College wrote "Lean on Me," blogged years ago, started trending, in part because I posted a piece where I had dropped this link onto a St. John's College Facebook group.

At No. 4,  from a year ago January, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod President Matthew Harrison is either actually dealing with or else pretending to deal with Trumpian-aligned fascism in his denomination.

No. 3? Calling out Robert Sapolsky for being all wet on the hoary chestnut of "free will vs determinism," first for believing this dichotomy really exists and secondly for plumping for determinism.

No. 2 deserves a hat tip to Paul Davidson of "Is That in the Bible"? I riffed on a post of his, into standing both the kingship of Josiah and the development of Deuteronomy on their heads.

Drumroll ....

No. 1? As if a first round of proofs wasn't enough, "More proof the Buddha was no Buddha." Goes way back to 2007, but trended because I posted it to a subreddit in response to some Buddhist chuds. But, the comments long before that, like "Addie"? Claiming that the Buddha's teachings are ineffable sounds like Paul quoting Job in Romans. Nope on both.


Thursday, January 11, 2024

Top posts of 2023

 Again, not all of these may have been written in 2023, but they were the most read last year.

We'll start from the bottom.

At No. 10, from January 2023, me calling out a then-new moderator at Reddit's r/AcademicBiblical site as a moderator Nazi, for various good reasons, which eventually got me comment-banned there, and led to me starting my own, currently restricted group. 

No. 9 was also from last year and was various commenting fails by "Smart Fool" at the same subreddit. (There will be more; when none of the mods has an academic biblical degree, even at the bachelor's level, you get problems.)

No. 8? The myth that Paul Hill from St. John's College wrote "Lean on Me," blogged years ago, started trending, in part because I posted a piece where I had dropped this link onto a St. John's College Facebook group.

No. 7, from way back in 2009, trending because I posted it to various biblical subreddits, including with the Nazi. "Paul, Passover, Jesus, Gnosticism" ties together several critical threads.

No. 6? As if a first round of proofs wasn't enough, "More proof the Buddha was no Buddha." Goes way back to 2007, but trended because I posted it to a subreddit in response to some Buddhist chuds. But, the comments long before that, like "Addie"? Claiming that the Buddha's teachings are ineffable sounds like Paul quoting Job in Romans. Nope on both.

No. 5? Back to this past year. Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod President Matthew Harrison is either actually dealing with or else pretending to deal with Trumpian-aligned fascism in his denomination.

No. 4? Way back in 2006, but trending because I posted it to r/classicalmusic. "Mahler: the anti-Beethoven" invites discussion.

No. 3? "Say goodbye to History for Atheists" was written in 2017, but has been updated more than once since then.

No. 2 goes back to the world of Reddit. I called out anally-retentive mods at r/religion and (of course) got banned.

Drumroll ....

No. 1 again goes to r/AcademicBiblical, as I called out a shitload of stupidity in people commenting on a post about the Woman Taken in Adultery pericope from John.

Saturday, November 18, 2023

Trumpian headache for LCMS prez Matty Harrison grows

 His Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod pastor from Illinois, the Revvvvvvv. (Rush Limbaugh voice, political wingnuts) Stephen C. Lee, one of Fulton County (Georgia) District Attorney Fani Willis' "Dirty 19" indictees, and the smallest fish in the overall tank NOT to cop a plea, is back in the news in this New York Time profile of his recent activities.

Making the reasonable assumption that he's guilty (he's clearly guilty of stalking the election worker, at a minimum), I'm sure LCMS President Matthew Harrison wishes he would indeed cop a plea.

That said, knowing the LCMS and its standoffishness within the world of conservative mainline Protestantism, what probably cheeses Harrison — and even more, the people in positions of theological big stole swinging to his right — even more than that is him appearing at some EEEEvangelical church in metro Chicago. If Lee prayed before or with people there as part of an official religious event, that could give Matty the excuse to crack down on him without the hard right being able to lay a theological or church-political glove on him without hypocrisy. I don't know if that happened, but the congregation DID "bless Lee," the story said. Matty's got a theological case IF he wants to pursue it.

Ditto, if he gave appearance of being an LCMS pastor in his 2021 endorsement of Trumpian Congresscritter candidate Jim Marder. That said, Matty's probably too weaselshit to pursue that angle if Lee did indeed do this. (Although I may be wrong. That said, it would be weaselshit to pursue this angle ahead of the angle of him politicizing his call, which he has clearly done, whether found legally guilty of the charges against him or not — and also, whether found civilly liable in the lawsuit against him or not.)

As for Lee, or more precisely, his legal beagle David Shestokas, who apparently didn't let the Times interview his client? First, the claim that he was wanting to counsel Ruby Freeman, as "pastoral activities," in the face of the hassling she'd already been facing is so laughable it's not even high-grade bullshit, it's back shelf bullshit.

As for this claim that this wasn't coordinated with any of the other Devils Who Went Down to Georgia (I see what I did, late, unlamented wingnut Charlie Daniels), how would he know to seek out Harrison Floyd, leader of Black Voices for Trump, if he wasn't at a minimum "connected"? (Willis' office trying to prove coordination, not just connection, might be tougher.) A reporter asked just that question, and Shetokas gave a non-answer.

Finally, I don't know what Lee's White ethnic background is, but within Whites, German-Americans broke harder for Trump than any other White ethnic group. Yes, more than Scotch-Irish of Southern stereotype.

Saturday, October 14, 2023

Top blogging for the third quarter of 2023

As with my main blog, where I do a monthly top 10, not all of these are from the last three months. I'll note there they are not. And most, in fact, are not.

No 10 is from 2021, about Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod President Matt Harrison's underhanded closure of Concordia University Portland.

No. 9 is from recently, though: it's about a high-grift tour of the US of the fraudulent, bogus, bullshit "James Ossuary." Actually, the tour is only here in Tex-ass right now.

No. 8? My 2019 review of Lyndal Roper's Luther bio. (It is near Reformation Day, where conservative Lutherans turn into pumpkins if they see a shadow of Luther legend refuted.)

Speaking of? At No. 7, my 2017 roundup of Luther legend.

If an underhanded closure of a university wasn't enough, at No. 6 Matty Harrison earlier this year had to worry about one of his ministers being among Fani Willis' Dirty 19.

At No. 5? I take down "The Smart Fool," one of the overly self-inflated commenters at the r/AcademicBiblical subreddit.

At No. 4? An oldie but a goodie from 2020, getting new traction because I posted it for Democratic tribalists on r/politics. That's about St. Anthony of Fauci's various Platonic noble, then more ignoble, lies about COVID.

No. 3? Even older, but, it's never too late to keep kicking and saying good-bye to Tim O'Neill, the papal apologist of History for Atheists.

No. 2? From this quarter, more wrongness at r/AcademicBiblical, namely "The Woman Taken in Adultery" pericope of John 7:53-8:11.

Drumroll .....

And No. 1? Anal-retentive backdoor liars at r/religion.

Saturday, August 26, 2023

More trouble for Matty the LCMS boss with Trumpy pastors

 "Matty," as I love to call him, is THE (Rush Limbaugh type voice), Matthew Harrison, ongoing president and almost president-for-life of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, the largest denomination of the conservative, nay fundamentalist (sorry, sis, but call it as I see it) wing of Lutheranism in America.

The latest trouble? As sis alerted me, one of his minions, THE Rev. Stephen C. Lee, is among Fulton County Attorney Fani Willis "Dirty 19." In more detail, per the NYT, he's got five counts:

2 counts Criminal attempt to commit influencing witnesses 
1 count Violation of the Georgia RICO Act 
1 count Conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings 
1 count Influencing witnesses

Tis true one is a Georgia RICO count and one a conspiracy count but three are first-level counts. And, the witness influencing? To put it in terms of the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments, all three counts are attempts to get somebody to "bear false witness."

So, after starting this a week ago, I went to the Looserun Missourians Facebook, then the website again.

Crickets.

I told sis that he's out of Matty's grasp, being emeritus, but she said he's an interim pastor. Presuming the charges have reasonable evidentiary backing, he doesn't care whether he's in Matty's interim grasp or not.

So, having pushed a Nazi fellow traveler pastor out, but probably still facing more of "The Cross and the Swastika," to riff on an old book, Harrison has this on his plate. And, he still has the Hot Chalk lawsuit over Portland, and, though I've seen nothing about it, ex-student lawsuits, too; a full Portland blue-plate special, worth non-diner prices of tens of millions of dollars, maybe hundreds of millions, not to mention the "pricelessness" of craptacular ethics, possibly from the boss man himself, on the student lawsuits. But non-wingnut LCMSers can't unite on anybody to replace him and when presidential voting goes past the first round, if it does, he wins, as the "moderate right" won't have all votes unite on the remaining candidates.

I think, to tie this back to national secular politics, Harrison's supporters, albeit much more quietly, rely on the national Democratic presidential argument that a vote for (Jill Stein, Cornel West, Howie Hawkins, fill in the Green blank) is "actually" a vote for Trump, and insinuate that voting for whichever of the moderate right candidates is on the ballot is actually a vote for the wingnut right candidate.

==

New news on Lee here.

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Fascism in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod? Yes; The Cross and the Swastika

Rick, I am SHOCKED there's gambling in the house of Matthew Harrison (pictured at right), and the people even more wingnut than him). And, sadly, in another sense, I didn't think of the addendum to the original headline, punning on a 50-year-old book that might be remembered by a few, until after the original post.

Vermont Digger has the details on a former distillery owner there who appears to be the owner of a podcast that pushes Lutheran fascism. 

Actually, a Rolling Stone article to which it links has the real details, about a Corey Mahler who co-hosts a podcast with who seems to be Ryan Woodie Dumperth, the Vermont guy, as well as an overview of LCMS President Matthew Harrison's attempts to douse? control? the flames without getting burned himself. (Harrison was just elected to another three-year term to run the denomination, at about 1.8 million, the main one in the conservative wing of Lutheranism, last month.) Update: Yet more in general, and Mahler in specific, here.

A report on Mahler and others from outside the LCMS notes that young alt right are reportedly attracted to Lutheranism because of Martin Luther's own antisemitism. And, that is real, though not unique to Luther in his day, but not just a late-life issue, and sis and others I know, please don't try to explain it away. Martin Luther was antisemitic, not just anti-Judaism after he discovered he couldn't use Jews to do theological judo on the pope.

And, not-quite full-on Nazis in the LCMS didn't want to believe Mahler was who he is until Machaira Action's report forced the issue.

Update, March 22, 2024: Mahler's also some sort of conspiracy theorist. I ran into him on Twitter over a nutter idea he was proposing and ...

He later blocked me.  And, he later yet deleted that tweet.

In detail, here are Part 1 and Part 2 of their report. Punning on Scandinavians and an alleged food delicacy, they call this movement "Lutefash."

That said, per the Rolling Stone piece, Matty Harrison's "excommunication warning," per this blog, appears to have become excommunication action. But, what about Dumperth? What about the other cockroaches that will operate more subtly, perhaps with the cooperation of willing pastors here and there?

Per comments at this "Occidental Dissent" site, there's probably a few parish pastors among the commenters, and others in the Wisconsin Synod, about one-fifth the size of the Missouri Synod, and both even more hardcore traditionalist on theology and further right politically than Missouri. One commenter references a YouTube by Rev. David Ramirez, a LCMS pastor from St. Paul's, Union Grove, Wisconsin. (I guess Hispanic counts as "White" in this world?)

Bethany Lutheran Church, Springdale, Arkansas, and Rev. Gregory L. Jackson another to watch, per this blog by either him or it. Here's Jackson's Goodreads authorial page. Interestingly, he's also a King James Version nutter. Dude took a deep dive in an empty pool, too. Went to the former Lutheran Church of America's Augustana in Rock Island. Then an STM at Yale. Then Notre Dame. Then that deep dive in the empty pool.

As for how this all happened? My sister notes that Matty played with fire by entangling church and state years back. He's been the LCMS president since 2010, and as in the previous presidential election, fended off far-right challengers. He's semi far-right himself, as I see today's Missouri Synod, which is like today's GOP, and just as it's laughable to hear a Republican (like Will Hurd just announced for president) called a "moderate," the same holds true whenever applied to Harrison. He's won on the first ballot every time since his first election, but he's never broken 55 percent. Tim Klinkenberg, a seminary classmate of mine, was the apparent semi-right challenger in 2019. The Wiki link has links to all election results in its footnotes.

It should also be noted that German-Americans broke harder for Trump than any other white ethnic group, apparently driven in fair part by their liking in 2016 his claims to breaking with the neoconservatives within the GOP and having a more isolationist stance in his "America First," and the LCMS' roots are primarily in German-Americans. The LCA, part of which eventually became the ELCA of today, had its roots in older German-Americans from 200-plus years ago who lost more their Germanness, but even more in Scandinavian Lutherans of the Upper Midwest. The ALC half of the ELCA merger had a mix of German-Americans of about the same migration date as LCMS Lutherans, but with a Scandinavian contingent at least half that of the LCA as leavening.

As for how this all plays out? Harrison is enough of a political chameleon to largely stay above the fray, despite the Lutefash pinpricks. To the degree he thinks its too much heavy lifting, he'll ignore the underground network of pastors and congregations, of which I've only scratched the surface. (For the unfamiliar, the LCMS is almost, but not quite, as "congregational" in its church polity as the Southern Baptist Convention. It has all sorts of "underground networks," as I'm sure the SBC does as well. I have family-related info on that as well.)

Beyond that, Harrison has big financial fish to fry, namely the Hot Chalk lawsuit and others (perhaps consolidated into one, I would think, on the student lawsuits) over the LCMS' abrupt closure a couple of years ago of Concordia University Portland. Harrison's mixing of secular politics and church governance was a factor in how the pooch was screwed in its closing, too. So, too, was his eye on the dollar signs CUP was generating with Hot Chalk, and of course, the LCMS, like many conservative wings of mainline Protestant denominations, has a "golden calf" problem as it and others lose members.

Add this to Matty's political chameleon behavior, too. The Boy Scouts of America recently voted to accept gay Scouts, but not leaders. So, Harrison is going down the Bill Clinton route of 30 years ago and saying it's "don't ask don't tell" on gay Scouts at troops affiliated with LCMS congregations, and beyond that, in a legal memorandum of understanding, individual congregations still have the right to boot Scout troops. And, contra Rev. Bart Day, no, sexuality was always an issue in the BSA, until it decided to do its split-the-difference bullshit, presumably on grounds that gay Scoutmasters would be "groomers." (This ignores the BSA's long history of tolerating sexual abuse by Scoutmasters, of course.) I have no idea of what this Trail Life USA alternative to the BSA is, and wonder what happened to the old Lutheran Rangers. As for the Lutefash? Teh gay was sometimes OK in the early days of the German swastika boys, but after the Night of the Long Knives it went pretty much deep underground.

==

Update, Dec. 18, 2023: Matty's got new, and related, troubles since then. Like a pastor arrested as one of Fani Willis' "Dirty 19" Georgia election fraudsters. Said pastor, the Reeevvvvvv Stephen Lee, has gone on to likely violate LCMS doctrine about interfaith participation by appearing at a non-Lutheran church service to promote his part in the Trumpian cause.

Saturday, January 15, 2022

Top blogging of 2021

 Not all posts are from the past year, but these were the most popular by readership in the past year.

No. 1? Remains my calling out of Anthony Fauci for telling Platonic noble lies about mask-wearing or not, back in 2020. (He'd later tell other lies, first semi-noble, then totally mundane ones.

No. 2? My decade-ago calling out of the likes of Brian Dunning and Michael Shermer for engaging in libertarian pseudoscience pseudoskepticism.

No. 3? It's interesting it's trended this high, but it's a blog post of mine from last year about an Atlantic Monthly contributor, and (former?) regular Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter, for the weirdness, if you will, of his story about when he stopped (for a while) being an "ambulance chaser" because his own wreck made him an ambulance needer. My piece covered "PTSD, journalism, accidents, existentialism." The first three were involved; the fourth was my angle of entry.

No. 4? Veering to critical religion — not critical exegesis of texts, but criticism of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod and all the hypocritical dirtiness in its closure of Concordia University-Portland (with the denouement still ahead in the snarls of multiple lawsuits).

No. 5? My untangling of the "Young Hume" vs "Old Hume" on Pyrrhonism and more. Part of a serious of extended posts inspired by David Harris' critically acclaimed, yet actually somewhat spotty, recent biography.

No. 6? In which I told Jesus mythicists that Nazareth is real, and more to the point, was real 1st Century CE.

No. 7? The later semi-noble lies of Fauci got examined, in a psychological take on him and a sociological one on tribalist Democrats.

No. 8? A relatively recent one, showing how Harvey Whitehouse's ideas on the evolution of religion, by not being grounded in good philosophy of religion, jumped the shark. Sadly, it appears that the likes of a Scott Atran, by heading down a similar ev psych-based road, may also be "jumping."

No. 9? I pretty thoroughly deconstructed David Graeber's posthumously coauthored new book. (I even more thoroughly deconstructed its political angles at my main blog.)

No. 10? A philosophy and philosophy of science question is wrestled with: How do we define "life"?

Thursday, August 12, 2021

LCMS university Concordia Portland shuts down, denomination faces suits

 Yes, this is a year old, but shades of my own old St. John's College 35 years ago, still interesting.

The reasons are partly similar. Massive debt, and declining enrollment even before the denouement, in what was in part at SJC, and probably at Portland, a vicious circle.

But not all the same. SJC, in Winfield, Kansas, 35 years ago, didn't have a Queer Straight Alliance student group and a Gender and Sexuality Resource Center. Nor "frank talk" about abortion or LGBQT etc. issues. Nor people including the campus pastor downplaying the religious background of a college owned by the main denomination of the conservative wing of American Lutheranism.

Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod President Matthew Harrison pushed to cut all this out in exchange for directors new loans for  campus construction work and other debt. And, the November 2019 Synod board of regents meeting said a permanent university president wouldn't be appointed until the sex stuff was eighty-sixed. At the same time, the board of directors, talking through Henson's ass, later claimed (as the scheiss was starting to hit the fan) that Oregon Public Broadcasting was wrong to make any assumptions like this.

A year later, last month? The LCMS Church Extension Fund, as primary lender, bought the campus for $3 million on foreclosure sale. (Indebtedness? Allegedly, $37 million.)

So, how did I come to this piece? A Slate piece, which mentioned ripoffs in master's degree programs, referenced Concordia by name and led to this piece from 2019. Scroll near the bottom for the Portland info. Portland had partnered with a privately owned online program management company, which, per Slate, usually takes a MASSIVE amount of the tuition payments. (Think of something like the old University of Phoenix in new drag.) 

Here's your nutgraf:

For a preview, take a look at Concordia University in Portland, Oregon, once a small, respected Lutheran teachers college. After creating an online master’s program with a Silicon Valley-based OPM called HotChalk, by 2015 Concordia had become the single biggest provider of education master’s degrees in the nation. (It’s currently the third-biggest provider.) An Oregonian investigation found that in five years, the number of graduate students went from 800 to 6,200, with HotChalk getting as much as 80 percent of tuition revenue.

But wait, that's not all. 

Then, the program was hit with very some familiar-sounding accusations. In 2013, a whistleblower lawsuit alleged that HotChalk ran a “classic boiler room” in which recruiters employed misleading practices to sign up students, including offering them “phony ‘scholarships.’” [7] The suit also alleges that recruiters’ caller IDs were masked with a Portland area code rather than that of the Arizona call center where they worked; that they were told never to mention HotChalk; and that they were paid bonuses based on enrollment and could be terminated for failing to meet quotas.Federal prosecutors also investigated whether Concordia had violated the rule prohibiting schools from outsourcing more than 50 percent of academic operations—the same rule Diane Auer Jones is bent on eliminating. According to the government, HotChalk “recruited, hired, employed, supervised and managed all or substantially all” of the online instructors who were ostensibly working for Concordia. Without admitting wrongdoing, the college settled with the government for $1 million—but, as the Oregonian reported, it was HotChalk that paid the bill.

But wait, THAT's not all!

At the second link, about the foreclosure sale? HotChalk claims it's owed THREE HUNDRED MILLION. I'm sure that's fake, but is still an issue; per that 2019 link and the second pull quote, there's probably some shadiness behind this. (OTOH, Harrison openly admitted the possibility of a "$400 million crater" early this year.

Per the last link, there's more items of interest as well. Portland had looked at leaving the LCMS. This idea was years too late. And, after whoring itself out to HotChalk, probably not realistic.

But, as the nation's top offerer of master's in education, and surely a major BA in Education school, being anti-gay, or perceived as such, would have meant no student teaching internships in Portland. And probably not in Eugene either.

Now, here's yet more questions. questions of ethics.

Matt Harrison can hate teh gay, but where were he and Synod's board of directors over this lawsuit? Where was the Concordia University System board of regents over this lawsuit? Portland's regents, if it has a separate board from the CU system?

For that matter, did neither Synod's board nor CU's board raise any eyebrows over the MASSIVE jump in graduate school enrollments? And, has either board taken any steps to keep the remaining universities from doing something similar?

We've got some HUGE LCMS mismanagement issues here, and Matt Harrison should be looking in the mirror. Per the foreclosure story, why the hell did Portland have a separate law school campus in Boise, Idaho?

The closure was announced one day after the cutoff date to seek tuition refunds. Had the closure been planned before that? (Per this piece, HotChalk claims that before the closure was announced, Portland transferred "valuable assets" to the Synod.)

And, Matt, through all of this, you've got more problems.

Per this piece about the CEF purchase, HotChalk has sued and a jury trial is set for November.

Per the presumable deception of students, there's a class-action lawsuit, also noted there.

And, per this, the Oregon Department of Justice is investigating, including the university-HotChalk issue.

"Discovery is a bitch," goes the old legal saying, and Harrison and the LCMS will soon find that out, especially on the ex-students' class-action lawsuit. (That's with the assist, and any others, from HotChalk listed above, if they pan out.) 

As far as the divisions within the LCMS between the firm conservatives and the true wingnuts? It's interesting that, per Harrison's Wiki page, he never has broken the 60 percent mark on a presidential election. It's also interesting, but not surprising, that he graduated Concordia The Logical Seminary in Fort Wayne.

He's up for re-election next year. Having served since 2010, will he be dethroned? He's still under 60; can't picture him stepping down on his own. But, if he is dethroned, will it be by the non-wingnuts, or by the wingnuts who think he's sacrificed ethical standards?

===

Sidebar: Bronxville, also reported to be on thin ice by the first OPB piece, has also closed

===

Various updates, March 2022: First, a judge has struck down a lis pendens that HotChalk had against the campus. Well, he HAD. In a later ruling, the same judge reinstituted it, claiming HotChalk's lawsuit gave it a legit claim to the property itself. Bigger point? The judge looked at HotChalk's discovery request for LCMS documents. He neither approved it nor denied it, but told the synod to give him some random documents related to the issue to inform a pending decision. And, proof that the lis pendens wouldn't hurt its sale? The University of Oregon has announced plans to buy the site. I see no updates on the student lawsuit. And, for April, the U has closed, for $60 million. Gee, that leaves Matty just $240 million short of what Hot Chalk wants, and I still don't know what students want.

August 2022: The U has finalized purchase of the site. Side note: The law school had received full ABA accreditation just a year before the closure. Re the HotChalk lawsuit, the only new thing is to see it will likely not start until next year. Nothing new on the students' suit. Wonder if HotChalk will approach Judge Eric Dahlin about any "freeze" on the UofO purchase money?

Side note two: Will Concordia Wisconsin (Mequon), per a prof locked out of his classes and reported on by wingnuts at the Federalist, be the next Concordia system university to face the ire of Harrison or people even further to his right? (It, like Portland, has a majority non-Lutheran, and likely large majority non-LCMS, student body.) That plot gets thicker, too! The locked-out prof was on the shortlist of "suggested" candidates Matt and the boys gave the university from which to select its president. The board of regents (which means, presumably, that Portland had its own board, and there wasn't a system-wide board) chucked that list. And, shock me that much of this has played out in the unofficial house organ of LCMS wingnuts, Christian News. Still nothing new on either the HtoChalk suit or the one by former students.

April 2023: According to this site, both university and Synod insiders sandbagged against the process of Portland going independent by blocking the process for a permanent new president in 2018. And, per this LCMS insiderish website, there are other hypocrisy angles. (The site seems to be tilted toward what passes for "moderate conservatives" in today's LCMS.) I don't have much else right now. Neither the Oregonian nor Oregon Public Broadcasting has anything new on the suits.)

June 2023: Of course, Matty has his hands full elsewhere, too, namely, fighting — or pretending to fight — fascism in the LCMS.

June 2023, part two: Of COURSE wingnut groups like Becket Law are grifting on this case.

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Martin Luther vs. Charles V

Last month, I noted that Martin Luther almost certainly did not say "Here I stand, I can do no other," at the end of the Diet of Worms, but likely ended with his "it's unsafe and unwise to go against conscience."

One of the links in that post notes that Charles V could just as well have said "to go against conscience is neither right nor safe." Good pious Catholic, he felt he had no choice but to eventually act against Luther. And, so he did on today's date 500 years ago, officially declaring Luther an imperial outlaw. 

That said, there appears to have been connivance between him and Duke Frederick. The bann was never officially promulgated inside Electoral Saxony. And Charles may have suspected early on that Luther's "kidnapping" was indeed just a ruse.

Charles remained a "good Catholic." BUT, after the Schmalkaldic War, he did NOT have Luther's grave desecrated. He also remained a good, dedicated Holy Roman Emperor wanting to keep the Empire unified without a degree of coercion that might crack it apart.

Since he likely knew nothing but royal schoolbook Latin, and in everyday languages, his knowledge of German trailed that of Flemish and Spanish, how much Luther's speech — and Luther's broader ideas — were translated for him is a big deal. Because, with translation would have come interpretation. If we're being charitable.

Could the two of them, with a pair of mutually accepted translators, or the two bringing their own sets of translators — plenty of German-Flemish/French dual speakers would have been available — gotten past Catholic hierarchical filters?

Possibly.

Even had Charles not been any more "sold" on Lutheranism, he might have had further degrees of toleration. After all, he waited five full weeks after Luther's speech, despite Eck being at Worms to lead the charge against Luther, before making his declaration.

But, likely?

Some part of me wants to think of Isaiah's "Come, let us reason together."

But, the facts of history point to Charles bringing the Inquisition to his native Netherlands in the early 1520s, where he could understand Calvinist and Lutheran claims without translation, at least in the Flemish regions. It points to him living out the last year-plus of his life in a monastery after abdicating his imperial and royal crowns. It points to him invoking his family tree when responding to Luther at Worms.

Facts of secular history also point to Charles having no qualms about maintaining the legend that his mother, Joanna, was "mad" so he could have control of the Spanish realms.

On the third hand, Charles, per the war issue, did not officially send a copy of the post-Worms Imperial bann to Elector Frederick, therefore it never had the force of law inside of Electoral Saxony. This, in turn, is why Luther went halfway to Augsburg in 1530. He went to the southern border of Electoral Saxon land.

Thursday, May 20, 2021

North American Lutherans and Reformed: Chasing a Roman will o' the wisp?

While reading Schilling's biography of Luther, one thing that was new to me (and never taught at my conservative American German Lutheran seminary), Schilling does note that Europe-wide (it eventually extended beyond there), Lutherans and Reformed came to an agreement in 1973 in Leuenberg, Switzerland. The semi wingnut Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod doesn't discuss this, nor does the full wingnut Wisconsin Synod Nor, seemingly, does the ELCA in detail. It led to a United Protestant Church in France and was 13 years in the making. It covered other doctrinal issues as well, and led to a fellowship of Lutheran, Reformed, and Prussian Union type churches in much of Europe, which also included … Waldensians!

Besides the Eucharist, other areas of discussion and eventual agreement included Christology [remember the old “the finite is not capable of the infinite”?], predestination and justification. European, including British, Methodist churches joined in 1997. Interestingly, though it has spread to the New World, with America's UMC, among others, and even to Lutheranism and Reformed in Argentina, no Lutheran body in either Canada or the US has signed on to the Leuenberg agreement.

The header is the off the top of my head reason why I can draw such a conclusion in the header. Even that, though is weird. The ELCA is in "altar and pulpit fellowship" with the Reformed Presbyterian Church USA and the Reformed-derived, now quasi-Unitarian United Church of Christ, and with the United Methodist Church. The Moravian Church, which is one fellowship worldwide, including US churches, is a member of Leuenberg.

Of course, it cuts both ways. The PCUSA and other US churches aren't there either. Ditto for Canadians.

It's true that, per the member churches website, plus the Wiki page, that the agreement's members are referred to as "The Communion of Protestant Churches in Europe." (Interesting that English is the language.)

But, again, there's those Argentinian churches.

And, it's not like this undercuts the World Council of Churches or something. In fact, per the Wayback Machine, the history of Leuenberg negotiations says the WCC encouraged the whole process.

About two-thirds down, the piece speaks to non-European ramifications, and references the ELCA's fellowship agreement with the three other churches.

Part of why none of these churches may have jumped on Leuenberg is mentioned by the author of that timeline:

As we have seen, the Lutheran-Reformed conversations are among the few bilateral dialogues where church fellowship has not only been proposed but actually ratified. Why has this result not had more far-reaching consequences? The explanation is to be found in the ecumenical movement itself. The early seventies were probably the last moment at which the Lutheran-Reformed conversations could still be brought to a successful conclusion. A few years later an agreement between the churches of the Reformation would have encountered far stronger opposition. A strange development took place in those years. There was a growing fascination with new relations with the Roman Catholic Church. In the Lutheran World Federation in particular, priority was being given almost exclusively to the dialogue with Rome. The fellowship among the churches of the Reformation was of course still basically welcomed, but at the same time it was felt to be a complication. If the dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church was to be conducted on the basis of Lutheran confessional criteria, the challenge of the Leuenberg Agreement had to be kept within limits. Warnings were reiterated about unacceptable bloc-building in the Protestant camp. A strange kind of "ecumenically justified immobility" has resulted. Again and again the realization of fellowship with Reformation partners is postponed in the name of a supposedly wider ecumenical fellowship. Instead of putting into practice the fellowship possible here and now among the Protestant churches, the status quo is left in place in the name of an as yet unattainable fellowship.

Interesting indeed.

I wonder if this is still the case, as it was 20-something years ago.

I mean, Rome under late-term JPII and Benedict XVI enlightened not one bit on a married priesthood or women as priests or even as lay ministers.

The author offers an update on this and other issues at the end.

He notes that attempts were made to move Leuenberg beyond Europe, but in part because of the siren song of Rome, they didn't gain much traction. Plus, Leuenberg member churches have to decide whether to view other fellowship efforts either through the lens of Leuenberg or through that of their confessional tradition.

Finally, he notes, where do union churches fall, within the WCC, the Lutheran World Federation or the World Alliance of Reformed Churches?

One thing Vischer does not address is that of greater fellowship with Orthodoxy. As with Rome, the question of how Leuenberg churches pursue such fellowship — what framework they use — seemingly looms large.

This gets much more into the weeds of inter-Christian issues than is normal for here, but ... I scratched an itch!

Saturday, May 08, 2021

May Crowning: The Catholic Juggernaut of sorts

 Showing that there's nothing new under the sun of religious practice?

Earlier this week, the local Catholic school had a procession Wednesday afternoon. It looked to be a purely religious event, what with seeing some girls wearing what looked like First Communion dresses. A statue of Mary was in a cart. We're in Texas, not on the border, and the statue was blue, so it couldn't be a Cinco de Mayo Black Madonna deal.

So, on Thursday I did a Google. I didn't think it was Corpus Christi; this good Lutheran knows that that's normally further after Easter (it's in June this year) and that this would have been a church, not school, processional, and I have not heard of the local church doing a Corpus Christi procession. (That said, since then, both churches in my news area have gotten new priests.)

Well, my Googling, or Duck Duck Go-ing, quickly led me to "What is May crowning for kids?" And here's a description from a Catholic church.

And, with the statue of Mary in what was essentially a large flower cart or a small Mormon handcart, and, knowing the Hindu roots of the English word "juggernaut," I was reminded of that. The article notes that, in fact, Franciscan missionaries of the thirteenth century were the first Westerners to record the event. That, in turn, is part of the larger Indian phenomenon of temple car.

Now, no Catholic throws themselves under the Mary cart, which unlike the temple cars for Jagannath, the namesake of the English word, aren't big enough to crush people. (That said, the idea that the faithful threw themselves under the cart wheels seems to be mainly if not entirely a European visitors' religious urban legend.) Well, maybe some Penitentes types do? I don't know. I'm thinking of the secret flagellationists, many of whom still carry a cross on Good Friday and a few of whom, in secret events, actually will be hung from one. (Side note: the veneration of Jagganath appears strongest in portions of Eastern India with the highest percentage of Dalits and Scheduled Classes for most of the country outside Kashmir. And, the fact that Kashmir is high on Scheduled Tribes is a further "interesting" item vis-a-vis the post-1947 history of Kashmir.)

For something less severe than that, maybe some Catholics throw written Lenten vows in the cart or something?

Finally, is there some explicit syncretism involved? May Crowning recognizes Mary as "queen of heaven," and Jagannath comes from two Sanskrit words meaning "lord of the universe." That said, Wiki says that before the rise of Hairy Fishnuts (thanks, Opus), aka Hare Krishnas, aka, International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Jagannath was little known in the west.

And, Wiki also has a piece about May festivals for Mary. It says the May crowning didn't start until the 1700s CE and its roots are unknown. For American Catholics, it's gotten tied to Mother's Day. Also per that, I blame John Paul II for its revival. Eastern European Catholic and Marian devotee.

To wrap up? Mary as "Queen of Heaven" comes from the official declaration of her as Theotokos at the First Council of Ephesus. And, THAT in turn is another sign that old Martin Luther himself didn't go far enough, vis-a-vis his Reformed counterparts, in rejecting Marianism.

Thursday, May 06, 2021

A third relatively new Luther bio is, overall to me, the least impressive

 As with Lyndal Roper and Heiko Oberman, this take on Heinz Schilling's "Martin Luther: Rebel in an Age of Upheaval" is an expansion of my Goodreads review, as with the other two. And with that, let's dig in.


Martin Luther: Rebel in an Age of UpheavalMartin Luther: Rebel in an Age of Upheaval by Heinz Schilling
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This was kind of tough book to rate.

Schilling gets partway behind the 8-ball in the prologue, when he repeats as fact the “Here I stand” legend — and legend it is — from Worms. He states it again when the time comes to discuss Worms in more detail. I was ready to 4-star and no higher for that reason. At the same time, he clearly rejects stuff clearly considered legend, like the story of throwing the inkwell at the devil. Elsewhere, he tries to split the difference on Oct. 31, 1517, claiming that Luther or somebody had a copy of the 95 affixed somewhere, but not the door, at the Castle Church, while ignoring what Luther may have done in the days before that to speed their dissemination.

And, no for sure on "Here I stand," as I recently explained. Per the same piece, and in yet more depth, per this blog post, the nailing of the 95 Theses, IF it happened, was not done to the door of the Castle Church, but rather, some sort of "bulletin board" beside it. And, IF it happened, Luther had also mailed out copies of the Theses to people like Archbishop Albrecht of Mainz, so the nailing, IF it happened, was pretty much superfluous. But, it almost certainly didn't. Melanchthon, who wasn't at Wittenberg yet in 1517, was the first to write up this claim, and Luther never made it in his own life.

He is also behind that 8-ball, though not as egregiously, when in the first section, he seems to indicate a certain chunk of educated people besides Columbus weren’t sure the world was round. I’m sure he doesn’t directly claim that of the Portuguese court, but it was a bit verstimmeled here. In reality, after the Spanish rejected him the first time, the Portuguese rejected him because they knew his distance estimates were off. I’m not sure if Eratosthenes’ guesstimates of the Earth’s size had come back to light yet, but I have no doubt that by the 1480s, Portugal had sailed far enough south in nearly a straight line that they knew Ptolemy was off. (The book 1493 claims that Columbus accepted Muslim rulers' guesstimates on the length of a degree of latitude at a flat 60 miles, so came up with an estimate between that of Eratosthenes and Ptolemy.)

But, Schilling also has some very good stuff. His framing of two main, important issues, led me to be ready to given him the benefit of the doubt on the above and five-star him.

Here’s some lesser things I either learned or had refreshed for me that aren’t mentioned in Oberman and Roper.

He talks early on the number and variety of vernacular translations of the bible long before Luther. Schilling says many of them were lay driven, like with the Waldensians, which has issues for Luther’s “priesthood of all believers” not being quite in line with the Predigeramt, which then gave him room to smash down lay-led Anabaptists. (That said, Schilling does touch a bit on Luther backtracking from his true “priesthood of all believers.”)

Notes the family name of Luder and how Luther, pulling a humanism, Graecizied it to Luther based on Eleutherios. He had “tried on” Eleutherios as a new, humanist surname, but soon let it go again.

Luther the hypocrite? Twenty years after supporting bigamy for Philip of Hesse, Schilling notes he accused Spalatin of supporting incest by OKing a widowered pastor to marry his dead wife’s stepmom. (Apparently our Old Testament scholar hadn’t read up on levirate marriage and other things, nor did he recognize how Rome’s ever tighter rules on marriage had led to the incipience of something like the “nuclear family.” Nor did he ever wonder if Roman canon law on this issue shouldn't be challenged.)

He notes Charles did not officially send a copy of the post-Worms Imperial bann to Elector Frederick, therefore it never had the force of law inside of Electoral Saxony. (This was apparently some sort of handshake deal between the two.) This, in turn, is why Luther went halfway to Augsburg in 1530. He went to the southern border of Electoral Saxon land.

He's better than Oberman or Roper on Luther vis a vis the Reformed, though not by much, especially compared to Roper on the Sacrament. Still no depth, nor whether Luther ever had an answer for Karlstadt on Greek grammar. (Oberman ignores this issue entirely; Roper and Schilling both never answer whether Luther ever tried to call out Karlstadt.)

New to me (and again, never taught at my conservative German Lutheran seminary) Schilling does note that Europe-wide (it eventually extended beyond there), Lutherans and Reformed came to an agreement in 1973 in Leuenberg, Switzerland. (LCMS doesn't discuss this! Nor, seemingly, does the ELCA in detail. It led to a United Protestant Church in France and was 13 years in the making. It covered other doctrinal issues as well, and led to a fellowship of Lutheran, Reformed, and Prussian Union type churches in much of Europe, which also included … Waldensians! Besides the Eucharist, other areas of discussion and eventual agreement included Christology [remember the old “the finite is not capable of the infinite”?], predestination and justification. European, including British, Methodist churches joined in 1997. Interestingly, though it has spread to the New World, with America's UMC, among others, and even to Lutheranism in Argentina, no Lutheran body in either Canada or the US has signed on to the Leuenberg agreement.)

Schilling doesn't father-figure psychoanalyze Luther, unlike Roper does at times (but not all the time by any means). He simply portrays him as obstinent, and increasingly so with age, and not just due to torments of aging. Says this was the case after Worms onward.

That said, per the subtitle of “Rebel in a Time of Upheaval,” Schilling nailed Luther’s psychology quite well. Per a Sherman T. Potter comment on a M*A*S*H episode, he was just a stubborn Missouri mule and got more that way the older he got, especially from the Peasants’ Revolt on. It’s why he addressed Zwingli and other Reformed at Marburg and elsewhere with as much vituperation as he addressed at popes.

That said, Schilling doesn’t extrapolate this to its conclusion.

Luther essentially as an individual acted just like he said the popes and councils he deplored acted: As though being infallible.

Spoiling for a fight with Erasmus yet biding his time?

Schilling is definitely good on Lutheranism emerging as a territorial church vis-a-vis the various Calivinisms that sought, rather, to take over the state, or the Separatist types who sought to be separate. This relates to one of two main issues he gets better than Roper or Oberman, or maybe somewhat to both.

Schilling, as a professor of early modern history, rather than one of theology, is good at Luther’s Sitz im Leben, the actual transition to early modernity. At times, he contrasts the Luther of the 100th, 200th, 300th, 400th and 500th birthdays, at least as celebrated in Germany states in the first three cases, united Germany in the fourth and East and West Germany in the fifth, vs. the reality of Luther’s stance on economics and other things. He ties some of this to the development of Lutheranism vs. Calvinism.

The other item that he was good on, and stressed a lot in the second half of the book, was Luther’s doctrine of the two kingdoms.

Well, at first. He was great about talking about Luther on the two kingdoms on paper, but NOT as this played out, or mis-played out, in reality.

In other words, there’s a WHOPPER of a misfire on Luther’s doctrine of the two kingdoms vs Luther’s reality, namely in his comments about Jews and Turks. Luther’s comments about the Jews are well-known, including his willingness to invoke the power of the state against them. And, that’s highly contradictory to his professed doctrine. Read more about Luther on the Jews here.

And, a lesser failure, IMO, of claiming Luther showed his two-kingdoms theology by leaving war against the Turks in the secular hand. If Luther had not peddled every Christian PR line about Muslims, would he necessarily have called for the Imperial state to wage war against the Ottomans primarily because they were Muslim, not because they were a threat to the Empire? After all, Francis I of France made an alliance with them.

Schilling then claims that Luther’s focus re the Jews was only a religious anti-Judaism but later admits Luther talked about Jewish blood at the end of his life. Related: Jewish occupational stereotypes, if not about “blood,” are about culture and not religion.

Schilling tries to defend himself here as writing a historical presentation, not a critical history. To me, it comes off as an apologia, in its theological and related use, as in a 1531 Lutheran foundational work, rather than a historical presentation.

So, five bottom lines:

1. This is a more uneven four-star than Roper for sure and maybe than Oberman.

2. Had Schilling not peddled the two-kingdom issues so hard, I'd been kinder. But he left himself open.

3. Of the three, Roper is best. She’s arguably a 4.5 star, but still leaves enough off the table to not get the bump. The two gents don’t cross 4.0 stars.

4. The back of my mind wonders if Schilling is a member of the “free” Lutheran Church in Germany.

5. None of the biographies does a great job (other than the Jewish polemics issue) of dealing with post-Augsburg Luther, tho overall, Schilling is the best, mainly at talking about how Luther got more stubborn, egotistical, and convinced of his own terminal rightness.


View all my reviews

On the big picture? Contra what I said at the end of Oberman, I hadn't scratched my Luther bio itch enough. NOW I have. 

Of "giants" from the past? Bainton, were I to re-read it for review purposes today, would probably get a 3.5. Maybe a bump up to four. Erickson's "Young Man Luther" would be a flat three, if that. And, I have no desire to re-read either one.