It's easy to pontificate against a Bart Ehrman's approach to establishing the likelihood of the Jesus of history actually existing by establishing that different sources about him exist.
But that's exactly what Tom Dykstra does when pretending not to take sides between Ehrman and Thomas Brodie.
No, we don't have "Q." But we do have the Gospel of Thomas. But Dykstra nowhere mentions that.
We have John as a witness independent of the Synoptics. But Dykstra nowhere mentions him.
Given that Dykstra makes these claims, or lies by omission, in an academic paper, he seems pretty silly. And Dykstra in other writings has indicated he's mythicist-friendly.
This is a slice of my philosophical, lay scientific, musical, religious skepticism, and poetic musings. (All poems are my own.) The science and philosophy side meet in my study of cognitive philosophy; Dan Dennett was the first serious influence on me, but I've moved beyond him. The poems are somewhat related, as many are on philosophical or psychological themes. That includes existentialism and questions of selfhood, death, and more. Nature and other poems will also show up here on occasion.
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment