This is a slice of my philosophical, lay scientific, musical, religious skepticism, and poetic musings. (All poems are my own.) The science and philosophy side meet in my study of cognitive philosophy; Dan Dennett was the first serious influence on me, but I've moved beyond him. The poems are somewhat related, as many are on philosophical or psychological themes. That includes existentialism and questions of selfhood, death, and more. Nature and other poems will also show up here on occasion.
Thursday, October 23, 2025
'Karma' 2.0 — a secular spin on Edward Arlington Robinson
Thursday, October 16, 2025
Top posts for the third quarter of 2025
As usual on this quarterly roundup, these top posts may not all have been FROM the previous quarter, just the most commonly read. I'll note the "evergreen" ones.
No. 10 is from the early salad days, indeed, 2007, "A birthday poem for 'Pharayngula' aka P.Z. Myers." That was of course before I realized he was a Gnu Atheist.
No. 9 is from 2023, and I think I know why "Fascism in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod" is trending again. It's due to LCMS President Matthew Harrison's anointing of Charlie Kirk.
No. 8 is even older than No. 10, from 2006. My "More philosophical reflections from my national parks vacation" was a riff on "Dover Beach."
No. 7? My piece from 2023, "Standing Josiah and Deuteronomy on their heads" may be trending from some Reddit link. (I love how people claim it's too convoluted. In my opinion, they either don't want to read it through, just can't understand how the "Josiah" and "Deuteronomy" parts overlap, and/or don't get the research behind either half of it.)
No. 6, "Thoughts from Olympus," is from the same vacation as No. 8.
No. 5 is an oldie but a goodie. "More proof the Buddha was no Buddha" is from 2007.
No. 4, "A Lutheran college myth bites the dust," is about the truth of the song "Lean on Me" and is from 2020.
No. 3, "The great ahistoricity of Acts and radical thoughts on Paul's demise," from 2020, is trending because I posted it on r/AskHistorians at Reddit and then had the Nazi moderators pull it down. They later banned me, which I discussed at my main site.
No. 2 is "Genesis 6 Retold," which I shared in various spots recently. It's an extended haiku riff on the myth and legend behind the flood story.
No. 1, "Ezra, meet Snopes" is from way back in 2005, not too long after I started this site, and discusses some thoughts behind the idea of Ezra as editor of the Torah and its four main documentary strains.
Thursday, October 09, 2025
Novels, nostalgia and need
I grew up in Gallup, New Mexico, self-proclaimed "Indian Capital of the World."
Years and years ago, I read many, though not all, of murder mystery author Tony Hillerman's Chee and Leaphorn novels, about two Navajo Tribal Police officers, (I also read two non-Big Rez murder mysteries of his.)
Hillerman has long come off as sympathetic to Navajos in particular, and American Indians of the Southwest in general, as people. Going beyond oater dime novelist Louis L'Amour, who said more than once if he wrote about a place, "it was there," with Hillerman, not only was the place there, but so were the sociology and culture.
Well, recently, for various reasons, I started reading some of Hillerman again. But, after "Sacred Clowns," I may have hit a wall. An edited version of my Goodreads review will explain why.

Sacred Clowns by Tony Hillerman
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
On my "formula" for mid-level fiction reviews?
Characters 4.25-4.5
Plot 4.5
Dialogue 4-4.25I'll take that to 4.5 or so overall but, round down due to an error.
Nope,
it's "dropped" to 3 stars due to other issues listed at bottom. Some
are specific to this book; others, the majority, apply to the Hillerman
"canon" in general. I'm going to get to that after a condensed version
of the first part.
On characters, Jim Chee as acting sergeant
shows a first round of character development within the Chee-Leaphorn
books, accepting enough of Lt. Joe Leaphorn's experience-developed
wisdom to actually follow some rules. He also finds out that he may not
be enough of a traditionalist to satisfy old-time hataałii
(usually rendered by Hillerman as "shaman" or similar) to become one
himself, complexifying his look at Janet Pete as too much of a "city
Indian." One book later than Coyote Waits and two earlier than First
Eagle, when you look at the series, you can see this "character plot
line" developing. In addition to their hot-and-cold at times, the
ethical playoff late in this story is good. As with widower Leaphorn's
quasi?-romantic relationship with Prof. Bourebonette, this is Hillerman
writing a generally internally consistent set of stories.
...
St. Bonaventure
in Thoreau? It was there when I was growing up in Gallup eons ago. Not
sure if it's the same church building today or not. Back then, it had a
wood-plank floor that doubled as a roller skating rink, including being
rented out; my church's youth group went out there more than once. I
don't know if Gallup didn't have a roller rink then, or it was too big
to rent to small groups, or what. (Or so I thought it was there. Teh
Google lists skating in Gallup itself and not in Thoreau today, but
Google Maps with "roller skating Thoreau NM" pointed to the Thoreau
Community Center. Maybe skating moved there, or maybe that was the
original church building.)
This all is why Hillerman is not
dime-novelist Louis L'Amour, who used to brag that if a place was listed
in one of his novels, it's there. With Hillerman, the people and
culture are there, too.
But now, the problems start, beginning with smaller ones and working to bigger.
First,
he mentions an Iyanbito and Iyanbito Chapter House south of Gallup [pg
121, hardcover], and the only one I am familiar with is the one to the
east. Besides, the Red Rock Chapter House is to Gallup's south. See for yourself. I have driven past Iyanbito many, many times. It has an exit on I-40. This is why I double-taked.
Sorry,
Tony, but you don't explain why you "moved" Iyanbito if deliberate.
And, a basic error otherwise? On the border on ratings, that gets you
bumped down on the Navajo authenticity issue. That said, in this Smithsonian piece
he admits to "shuffling around" places to meet his needs, but? There
was no need for this. Nor for calling the Zuni Drive-In the Gallup
Drive-In. Was it going to sue? It closed in 1982, anyway, so it
couldn't. (I saw "Star Wars" there as a kid.)
There's an issue or
two in other Hillerman novels that generally hold him at four stars,
not five. For instance, he talks about "the Tuba City type of Navajo," a
description both sociological, in terms of demeanor, and
physiologically, in terms of build, as if genes work that
deterministically and there's no outbreeding into that small area. And,
of course, none of that is true.
Now, to a bigger issue, expressed in this novel, and I think one or two others.
That is his take on the American Indian Movement
. Yes, many people within Navajo leadership didn't like it. That's
because it challenged their authority, just as on the Sioux
reservations. Calling its leadership, like Dennis Banks and Russell
Means, "city Indians," comes off as a bit, or more, condescending. And,
it's a lie. Banks was born on a reservation in Minnesota. Means was born
on a reservation in South Dakota. Both Bellencourts were born on
reservations. Banks was forcefully removed to a BIA boarding school at
age 5. Means' parents moved to San Francisco at age 3 to escape poverty;
the Bellencourt family moved to Minneapolis when older brother Vernon
was 16.
This comes off sounding like my dad. (I remember when AIM
came to Gallup.) I've outgrown that, Tony. This review goes down to
three stars, and I read you more skeptically on "flavor of the
Southwest" in the future.
For a truly nuanced and insightful book on AIM, especially in the Siouxan heartland of its operations, read "The Unquiet Grave."
And, I realized I have now been "triggered," or if I accept that something like free will exists (I do, if you emphasize the "something like" and that it is not necessarily totally conscious), I have self-triggered.
First,
the quasi-sneer about "city Indian" (also Blizzard, the "city Indian"
Cheyenne from Chicago BIA agent in this novel) surely affects
Hillerman's authorial stance toward Janet Pete throughout the entire
series of his novels. He doesn't totally throw her under the bus when he
has the final break-up between her and Chee, but he does entirely write
her out of future books. Did his attitude toward "city Indians" in
general harden as he grew older?
Related? As I think more
skeptically, while Hillerman may not totally paint a romantic Rousselian
noble savage view of reservation Navajo life, the toes of one of his
two feet, at minimum, are in that swamp. And I use that word
deliberately. In reality, not only is the poverty worse than he
portrays, but bits of it are to some degree self-inflicted. Navajos
overgrazed the land badly enough a century ago that, for this reason as
well as price controls, Navajo sheep, like Iowa hogs, were "culled" as
part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act in the 1930s. There's some
degree of overgrazing again. Beyond that, as disagreements between
chapters over Bears Ears have shown, there's not a "unified Navajo
stance" on many things. In either case, on the land, as he has Chee
drive by the pivot irrigation lands of what is today Navajo Agricultural
Products Inc, and contrast them with a bit of ruefulness to the buttes
and mesas, he overlooks the sheepherding.
In other words, to mash up Colbert and a cliche? "Truth is truthier than fiction."
Another
issue? I think Hillerman has a generally bilagaana take on frybread,
which is a flash point among many modern American Indians of many
tribes. That's
also not specific to this book, but, I never recall Chee, as an
"authentic" Navajo, in any of my past Hillerman reading, saying it's not
authentic Navajo food.
One other issue. One of Hillerman's novels is entirely on the
Zuni reservation. Others have Hopi connections. But? Even though the Ute
Mountain Ute reservation is directly north of the New Mexico portion of
the Big Rez, I'm unaware of any Ute characters in any of his novels.
Also not mentioned, IIRC? The Paiutes who actually live on the Utah
strip portion of the Big Rez. (Indeed, some of these Paiutes have Navajo
surnames like Begay or Yazzie.)
One OTHER other issue. Why,
given Leaphorn's strident antipathy to alcohol, after his wife's death,
does Hillerman name his new female interest Bourebonette? Yes, the
initial "e" hides it, but really? Something like "bourbon"? Am I the
first to notice this?
Anyway, beyond being self-triggered, I
realized my nostalgia leading me to re-read Hillerman wasn't as much
nostalgia as escapism — not the escapism of reading fiction, but real
escapism, the desire to move out of Tex-ass, with the New Mexico of my
childhood years a reasonable option financially — should I get a
pre-retirement job there — among today's US Southwest and Western
states.
Expanding beyond my main blog, this probably isn't that likely. The sewer of U.S. job hunting sites gets worse and worse all the time. And, I'm not well-enough off to say that post-retirement moving will be easy.
View all my reviews
Saturday, October 04, 2025
Still looking for ways to improve the blogroll
Looking at a couple of recent additions, as I delve in:
==
I can't remember where I saw "The Amateur Exegete," but I thought he looked promising at first.
He looks less and less so now.
He has a critical approach to scholarship, but it's on the conservative side of that. To use a "name" on the New Testament side? He's James McGrath level, probably.
His Aug. 24 roundup? (He hosts some sort of critical religious thinking blog roundup, or hosts it for himself) Believing in the historicity of Moses? At least he presents the modern critical conventional POV.
His Aug. 17 roundup? Worse, with the last entry, who he admitted in comment exchange is a personal friend:
Blogger καταπέτασμα writes about the Matthean narrative’s guarded tomb and argues that the story seems to suggest Pilate was aiming to kill a resurrected Jesus if push came to shove.
I clicked through, and while it's bad, it's arguably NOT the worse that guy has written.
That said, the roundups do give me a few connections. That's where I saw the idiotic new Testimonium Flavianum book, including a free PDF.
A Sept. 11 post? He linked to the odious Tim O'Neill with No. 16 in his series of "Great Myths." I told this dude that O'Neill's greatest myth was his self promoted myth denying papal antisemitism. So far, he hasn't responded.
His Sept. 21 roundup? Links to reviews of multiple evangelical bible commentaries etc. This is NOT a blog carnival; it's a personal roundup, like the ones above.
His Oct. 12 roundup? He's not convinced of the non-existence, the non-historicity, of Abraham.
I had thought he was an atheist, but reading his "about" more carefully, he's a None. He says his goal is to promote better biblical understanding. And he's not doing it, not IMO.
So that I don't forget about free books, I may move him to my links list but delete him from the blogroll feed.
==
Through a Bible Darkly is good, from what I can see — but posts so rarely.
==
Markus Vincent is here to see how much he discusses other issues besides his "heterodox" take on Marcion vs Luke.
==
Thoughts on Papyrus is a lot more into fiction than I am and may move to the links list.
==
Atheology has been removed, period. As I read through it more, the author has much more of his own confusion than he claims "philosophers" have.
==
I have added ResoluteReader, who seems a lot more of what I'm looking for. Reads more nonfiction than Papyrus, and the same broad vein as I do. Well, sort of. He is some sort of Marxist, which this leftist definitely is not. For example, I would never try to situate environmentalism within even a semi-Marxist framework.
Thursday, October 02, 2025
Funerals and obits: The quick and the dead
Per the header, and per the old saying about funerals being for the living, not the dead, the same is true, maybe even true in spades, for obituaries.
(Note: Throughout this, I intend to use the word “dead” as much as possible. “Departed” or similar will be used as necessary for linguistic variance. The words “passed” or “passed on,” except for this reference quote, will be avoided like the plague. I “love” how much they’re used in obits, especially by theoretically rock-solid conservative Christians. Last I checked, Paul said: “For me to live is Christ, to die is gain.” No “passed on” nor a Hellenestic world equivalent euphemism.)
As a newspaper editor, I first learned that professionally several years ago when, at the site I was at then, two different family members submitted different obits for the same recently dead loved one.
I can’t remember if both were created by a funeral home, one by a funeral home and the other personally written, or if both were family written. The newspaper wound up accepting both, then our publisher checked in with the home office of our small chain about long-term policy.
I have since then experienced that both professionally and personally with the same obit.
A couple of years after I got to my current site, I got my owner to agree to charge for the extra length on “overlength” obits. In other words, a basic length obir would still be free, but, if you wanted to go more than 850 or so words, which is one-quarter of a newspaper page, you’d pay for anything over that length, with the extra, in terms of newspaper column inches, being billed at the same rate as a display ad.
Well, a 97-year-old, who had worked at this newspaper for 70-plus years, including four part-time years overlapping with me, primarily in the small print shop we still run, died recently. And, his one granddaughter, who had written about 1,500 words two years ago for his wife, which we let pass, turned in 3,300 or so.
A lot of people liked and loved Alvin. Was it universal? At least about a certain baseline level of affection? No.
Frankly, an obit that long comes off as ostentatious, at least to me. And, they knew we’d run it.
There’s a corporate chain in the county seat, and an enhanced shopper there. Both charge from the get-go on all obits, and I’m sure the family didn’t pay for a full-length one at either place.
It’s an adjunct to other observations I have made about small town life.
One is that “The smaller the bone, the more two dogs fight over it."
The other is that income inequality, and a parallel, which I shall call social inequality, can be more pronounced in small towns than in big cities. The rich guy who owns an oil drilling company may live only a few blocks away from a trailer park.
And by small town, I’m talking not under 15,000, but under 5,000. I realize this is alien territory to the great majority of Americans.
And, in towns this size, when someone appears that beloved, those who don’t think so aren’t so comfortable with saying so.
This ties in with the theme of this site in that psychology is in some ways an offshoot of philosophy, and that would include social psychology. (Contra Walter Kaufman and whatever the man himself might have said, David Hume, not Friedrich Nietzsche, was the world’s first psychologist, at least in some ways.)
Even more, per my “per the living,” it ties directly to a main theme here in being about secularism and metaphysical naturalism. When a person is dead, they no longer exist, so funerals and obituaries have to be “for” the living. They are “about” the dead, but that’s it. Ditto for celebrations of life, whatever the metaphysical beliefs the deceased held, and their family and friends still hold.
And, with that and critical revision, my reference to the Apostles' Creed and the old King James Version-style English of "the quick and the dead."