In an earlier post, I indicated that I not only agreed with Dan Dennett on the lack of a “Cartesian Central Meaner,” but even went beyond that. In the years since I first read “Consciousness Explained,” (which waggishly should have the better title of “Dan Dennett’s Idea of Consciousness Explained”), I’ve become more accepting of this idea.
Who has? Well, I said that I have.
Oops.
I think I (dang it, did it again, like the Knights Who Used to Say Nee) have a paradox worthy of Zeno.
There is no “I” (can’t say “I have no ‘I,’” can I [“I”?]) to accept that “I” don’t exist.
What a tangled web I (“I”) weave. Doug Hofstadter would just looove this one.
This is a slice of my philosophical, lay scientific, musical, religious skepticism, and poetic musings. (All poems are my own.) The science and philosophy side meet in my study of cognitive philosophy; Dan Dennett was the first serious influence on me, but I've moved beyond him. The poems are somewhat related, as many are on philosophical or psychological themes. That includes existentialism and questions of selfhood, death, and more. Nature and other poems will also show up here on occasion.
Sunday, November 20, 2005
Acceptance and no Cartesian Central Meaner — who’s accepting what?
Labels:
Dennett (Dan),
Philosophy,
Philosophy of mind
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment