For theists, atheists, and philosophers of religion and beyond, the
"problem of evil" is at the core of stumbling blocks of western
monotheism.
How can a deity be both omnipotent, or all-powerful, AND omnibenevolent, or all-good?
Theistic
apologists often appeal to god's inscrutability. In a nutshell, they
claim that what appears to be evil now is for our ultimate good, or
similar.
Gary Gutting says we need more than an appeal to ignorance, if we don't want to have a blind faith.
But, he misses what apologists also miss.
That
such an all-powerful, all-good god, even if he or she must allow local
evils, or allow short-term evils for long-term good, could
still explain himself/herself better to sentient created beings, and
*has
chosen* not to do so.
That, as I have repeatedly
identified it, is the "problem of psychological evil." And, I've yet to
see a theistic apologist adequately answer it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
There is no god and I am his prophet. — me
Nihil est ut in contentione ut memoria de mortuis. — me
==
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.